|
| |
|
|
SF영화의 장르적 특성에 관한 연구
파일 
SF영화의 장르적 특성에 관한 연구.hwp
[Size :
197 Kbyte
]
SF영화의 장르적 특성에 관한 연구.hwp
[Size :
197 Kbyte
]
분량 59 Page
가격 3,000 원
×
링크주소가 복사 되었습니다.
원하는 곳에 붙혀넣기 하세요
원하는 곳에 붙혀넣기 하세요
카트
|
다운받기
|
 네이버 ID로 다운 받기  카카오 ID로 다운 받기  구글 ID로 다운 받기  페이스북 ID로 다운 받기 |
뒤로
|
자료설명
SF영화의 장르적 특성에 관한 연구에 대한 자료입니다.
SF영화의장르적특성에
SF영화의장르적특성에
목차/차례
- 제 1 장 문제제기 .................................................................... 1
- 제 2 장 SF영화에 대한 선행 연구의 검토 ........................................ 4
- 1. 장르 비평에서의 SF에 관한 논의 ........................................................................... 4
- 2. SF에 관한 초기 비평 .............................................................................................. 5
- 3. 본격적인 SF 비평연구들 ......................................................................................... 6
- (1) SF영화와 포스트모더니즘 .................................................................................. 6
- (2) SF영화의 정치학 ............................................................................................... 8
- 1) 50년대 SF영화의 정치학 ........................................................................... 8
- 2) 7-80년대 SF영화의 정치학 ........................................................................ 9
- 4. 연구 대상 및 연구 방법 ....................................................................................... 10
- 제 3 장 현대 SF영화의 분석 ...................................................... 11
- 1. 외계인 영화 ........................................................................................................... 11
- (1) 우호적 방문객으로서의 외계인 ....................................................................... 13
- (2) 적대적 침략자로서의 외계인 .......................................................................... 16
- (3) 중립적 외계인 ............................................................................................... 18
- (4) 소결 ............................................................................................................. 19
- 2. 괴물 SF ............................................................................................................... 19
- (1) 과학이 만들어낸 괴물 .................................................................................. 21
- (2) 자본주의가 만들어낸 괴물 ............................................................................ 22
- (3) 소결 ............................................................................................................ 25
- 3. 사이보그 영화 ...................................................................................................... 26
- (1) 사이보그의 역사 .......................................................................................... 26
- (2) 사이보그 영화의 정치학 ............................................................................... 28
- 1) 긍정적 사이보그 .................................................................................... 28
- 2) 위협적 사이보그 .................................................................................... 29
- 3) 중립적 사이보그-레플리컨트 ................................................................... 32
- (3) 소결 ........................................................................................................... 35
- 4. 시간여행 영화 .................................................................................................... 36
- 5. 사이버펑크 ......................................................................................................... 38
- 제 4 장 결 론 ............................................................................................................... 40
- 참 고 문 헌 ................................................................................................................... 43
- Abstract ......................................................................................................................... 50
- <부록> .............................................................................................................................. 52
본문/내용
제 1 장 문제제기
현대 세계에서 살아가는 인간은 급속하면서도 근본적인 여러 변화를 겪고 있다. 그 변화의 동안은 과학 기술의 가속적인 발전이다. 현대 세계에 오면서 절대화되고 보편화된 과학 기술의 발전은 일상 생활을 살아가는 인간들의 이해의 범위를 넘어서는 듯까지 보인다. 과학의 발전은 풍요로운 인간의 삶으로의 진보를 약속하면서 등장한 것이었지만, 20세기에 오면서 인간의 모든 과학 기술 행위가 인간에게 치명적일 수 있는 결과들을 산출하기 시작하였고, 특히 핵폭탄의 발명과 환경파괴로 대표되는 현대의 위기는 인류의 생존 자체를 현실적으로 위협하는 지경에 이르렀다.
현대사회를 지배하고 있는 과학기술적 합리성은 그것이 처음 등장했을 때에는 “가난한 사람들에게 식량과 건강과 교육을 보급”해 줄 수 있는 희망적인 것으로 보이기도 했지만, 오늘날에 와서는 그러한 과학기술적 합리성 자체가 산업사회의 위험을 낳은 근본 원인으로 인식되게 되었다. 올리히 백(Olich Beck)은 “역사상 유례없는 거대한 풍요를 이룩한 근대산업사회의 원리와 구조 자체가 파멸적인 재앙의 사회적 근원으로 변모하는 사회”를 ‘위험사회’라고 개념화…
현대 세계에서 살아가는 인간은 급속하면서도 근본적인 여러 변화를 겪고 있다. 그 변화의 동안은 과학 기술의 가속적인 발전이다. 현대 세계에 오면서 절대화되고 보편화된 과학 기술의 발전은 일상 생활을 살아가는 인간들의 이해의 범위를 넘어서는 듯까지 보인다. 과학의 발전은 풍요로운 인간의 삶으로의 진보를 약속하면서 등장한 것이었지만, 20세기에 오면서 인간의 모든 과학 기술 행위가 인간에게 치명적일 수 있는 결과들을 산출하기 시작하였고, 특히 핵폭탄의 발명과 환경파괴로 대표되는 현대의 위기는 인류의 생존 자체를 현실적으로 위협하는 지경에 이르렀다.
현대사회를 지배하고 있는 과학기술적 합리성은 그것이 처음 등장했을 때에는 “가난한 사람들에게 식량과 건강과 교육을 보급”해 줄 수 있는 희망적인 것으로 보이기도 했지만, 오늘날에 와서는 그러한 과학기술적 합리성 자체가 산업사회의 위험을 낳은 근본 원인으로 인식되게 되었다. 올리히 백(Olich Beck)은 “역사상 유례없는 거대한 풍요를 이룩한 근대산업사회의 원리와 구조 자체가 파멸적인 재앙의 사회적 근원으로 변모하는 사회”를 ‘위험사회’라고 개념화…
참고문헌
Abbott, Joe. `The `Monster` Reconsidered: Blade Runner`s Replicant as Romantic Hero.` Extrapolation 34.4 (1993): 340-50
. `They Came from beyond the Center: Ideology and Political Textuality in the Radical Science Fiction Films of James Cameron.` Literature-Film Quarterly 22.1(1994): 21-7
Arendt, Hanna. The Human Condition. 『인간의 조건』. 이진우·태정호 역. 서울: 민음사, 1996.
Baxterm, John. Science Fiction in the Cinema. New York: Barnes, 1970
Beck, Uirich. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. 홍 성태 역. 『위험 사회: 새로운 근대(성)을 위하여』. 서울:새물결, 1997
Bergstrom, Janet. `Androids and Androgyny.` Camera Obscura 15 (1986): 15, 36-65.
Biro, Mattew. `The New Man as Cyborg: Figures of Technology in Weimar Visual Culture.` New German Critique 62 (1994): 71-109.
Biskind, Peter, `Pods, Blobs, and Ideology in American Films of the Fifties.` Shadows of the Magic Lamp: Fantasy and Science Fiction In Film. Ed. George Slusser and Eric S. Rabkin (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois UP, 1985. 58-71.
.Seeing Is Believing: How Hollywood Taught Us to Stop Worrying and Love the Fifties. New York: Pavtheon, 1983.
Bourget, Jean-Loup, `Social Implications in the Hollywood Genres.` Grant 50-8.
Braudy, Leo. The World in a Frame. Chicago & London: The Uni. of Chicago Press, 1976.
Bruno, Giuliana. ` Ramble City: Postmodernism and Blde Runner.` Kuhn 183-195.
Bukatman, Scott Richard. `Terminal Identity: The Virtual Subjectin Postmodern Science Fiction.` Diss. New York University, 1992. Ann Arbor: /uMI, 1993. 9237926.
.`Who Prigrams You? The Science fiction of the Spectacle.` Kuhn 196-213.
Byers, Thomas B. `Commodity Future.` Kuhn 39-50
Carter, Paul A. `I Have Seen the Future and It Irks.` Another Part of the Fifities. New York: Columbia UP. 227-255.
Chevrier, Yves. `Blade Runner; or, The Sociology of Anticipation.` TRrans. Will Straw. Science-Fiction Studies 32 (1984): 50-60.
Cranny-Francis, Anne. `Feminist Futures: A Generic Study.` Kuhn 219-227.
Collins, J. `New Genericity in the 1990s.` Film Theory Goes to the Movies. Ed. Jim Collins, Hilary Randner and Ava Preacher Collins. New York: Routledge, 1993. 242-263.
Collins, Robert G. `Star Wars: The Pastiche of Myth and the Yearning for a Past Future.` Journal of Popular Culture 11.1 (1997): 1-10.
Colwell, C. Carter. `Primitvism in the Movies of Ridley Scott: Alien & Blade Runner.` Kerman 124-131.
Corliss, Richard. `The Invasion Has Begun.` Time & July 1996.
Creed, Barbara, `Alien and the Monstrous-Feminine.` Kuhn 128-141.
. `From Here to Modernity: Feminism and Postmodernism.` Screen 28.2 (1987): 47-67.
.`Gynesis, Postmodernism and the Science Fiction Horror Film.` Kuhn 214-218.
. `Horror and the Monsterous- Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection.` Screen 27.1 (1986): 44-70.
Curtis, James M.`From American Graffiti to Star Wars.` Jounal of Popular Culture 13.4 (1980): 590-601.
Dean, Joan F. `Between 2001 an Star Wars.` Journal of Popular Film and Television 7.1 (1978): 32-41.
Dempsey, Michael. `Invaders & Encampments: The Films of Philip Karfman.` Film Quarterly 32.3 (1978-79): 17-27.
Dervin, Daniel. `Primal Conditions and Conventions: The Genre of Science Fiction.` Kuhn 96-102.
Desser, David. `Race, Space and Class: The Politics of the SF Film from Metropolis to Blade Runner,` Kerman 110-23.
Dickerson, Vanessa D. `The Ghost of a Self: Female Identity in Mary Shelley`s Frankenstein.` Journal of Popular Culture 27.3 (1993): 79-91.
Doll, Susan and Greg Faller. `Blade Runner and Genre: Film Noir and Science Fiction.` Literature-Film Quarterly 14.2 (1986): 89-100.
Fitting, Peter. `Futurecop: Neutralization of Revolt in Blade Runner.` Science-Fiction Studies 43 (1987): 340-354.
Francavilla, Joseph. `The Amdroid as Doppelganger.` Kerman 4-15.
Framdin, H. `Visions of the Future in Science Fiction Film from 1970 to 1982.` Kuhn 19-31.
Friedman, Norman L. `The Terminator: Changes in Critical Evaluations of Cultural Productions.` Journal or Popular Culture 28.1 (1994) 73-80.
Gabilondo, Joseba. Cinematic Hyperspace: New Hollywood Cinema and Science Fiction Film: Image Commodification in Late Capitalism. Diss. U of California, 1991. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1992. 9216488.
Gibson, William. Nwromancer. 『뉴로맨서』. 노혜경 역. 서울:열음사, 1996.
Gitlin, Todd. `Cornucopia and Its Discontents.` The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage. New York: Bantom, 1987. 227-225.
Glass, Fred. `The `New Bad Future`: Robocop and 1980`s Sci-Fi Films.` Science as Culture 5 (1989): 7-49.
. `Totally Recalling Arnold: Sex and Violence in the New Bad Future.` Film Quarterly 44.1 (1990): 2-13.
Gordon, Andrew. `Science Fiction Film Criticism: The Postmodern Always Rings Twice.` Science Fiction Studies 43(1987): 386ー391。
.`Science Fiction and Fantasy Film Criticism: The Case of Lucas and Spielberg.` Jourval of the Fantastic in the Arts 2.2 (1989): 81-94.
. `You`ll Never Get Out of Bedford Falls: The Inescapable Family in American Science Fiction and Fantasy Films.` Journal of Popular Film and Television 20.2 (1992): 2-8.
Goscilo, Margaret. `Deconstruction The Terminator.` Film Criticism 12.2 (1987-8): 37-52.
Grant, Barry K., ed. Film Genre Reader. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986.
Gwaltney, Marilyn. `Androids as a Davice for Reflection on Persinhood.` Kerman 32-39.
Haraway, Donna. `A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980`s.` Technoculture. Eds. Constance Penley and Andrew Ross. Minnesota: Minnesota UP, 1990. 173-200.
Huyssen, Andreas. `The Vamp and the Machine: Fritz Lang`s Metropolis.` After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodenism. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1986. 65-81.
Jameson, Fredric. `Postmodernism: Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,` 「포스트모더니즘: 후기자본주의 문화논리」. 정정호· 강내희 편역.『포스트모더니즘론』. 서울:터, 1989. 139-202.
. “Postmodernism and Comsumer Society.` The Anti-Aesthetics: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Ed. Hal Foster. Washington: Bay, 1983. 「포스트모더니즘과 소비사회」. 윤호병 외역『반미학』. 서 울: 현대미학사, 1993. 13-29.
. “Nostalgia for the Present.` Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Ligic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke UP, 1994. 279-296.
. `Progress Versus Utopia: Or Can We Imagine the Future?` Science-Fiction Studies 27 (1982): 147-158.
. SF Novels/SF Films.` Science-Fiction Studies 22 (1980): 319-322.
Johnson, Glen M. `The Body Snatchers as Novel and Film.` Hournal of Popilar Culture 13.1 (1979): 5-16.
Johnson, William, Focus on the Science Fiction film. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
Kavanagh, James H. Feminism, Humanism and Science in Alien.` Kuhn 73-81.
Kawin, Bruce. `Children of the Light.` Grant 236-257.
. `The Mummy`s Pool.` Mast & Cohen 466-481.
Keel, John A, `The Flying Saucer Subculture.` Communication in Popular Culture. Ed. Robert J. Brake. Ohio: Bowling Freen, 1975.
Kerman, Judith B. `Technology and Politics in the Blade Runner Dystopia.` Kerman 16-24.
. ed. Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott`s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick`s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Ohid: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1991.
Kuhn, Annette, ed. Alien Zone: Cultural Theory and Contemporary Science Fiction Cinema. London: Verso, 1990.
. `Border Crossting,` Sight and Sound 2.3 (1992): 14.
Kuiper, Koenraad. `Star Wars: An Imperial Myth.` Journal of Popular Culture 21.4 (1988): 77-86.
Landon, Brooks. `Rethinking Science Fiction Film in the Age of Electronic (Re)production: On a Clear Day You Can See the Horizon of Invisibility. Post Script: Essays in Film and the Humanities 10.1 (1990): 60-71.
Lowenthal, David. The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985.
Mast, Gerald, and Marshall Cohen, eds. Film Theory and Criticism. New York & Oxford: Oxford UP, 1985.
Meyer, David S. `Star Wars, Star Wars, and American Political Culture.` Journal of Popular Culture 26 (1992): 99-115.
Nagl, Manfred. `The Science Fiction in Historical Perspective.` Science-Fiction Studies 31 (1983): 262-277.
Neale, Stephen. Genre. BFI, 1980.
. `Questions of Genre.` Screen 33.1 (1990): 45-66.
Newton, Judith. `Feminism and Anxiety in Alien.` Kuhn 107-17.
Norberg-Hodge, Helena. Ancient Futures: Learning from Ladakh. 『오래된 미래: 라다크로부터 배운다』. 김종철·김태언 역. 대구: 녹색평론사, 1996.
Ohlin, Peter. `Science Fiction Film Critism and the Debris of Postmodernism.` Science-Fiction Srudies 55 (1991): 411-19.
Penley, Censtance. `Time Travel, Primal Scene and the Critical Dystopia.` Kuhn 116-127.
Pfeil, Fred. `Home Fires Burning: Family Noir in Blue Velvet and Terminater 2.` Shades of Noir: a Reader. Ed. Joan Copjec. London: Verso, 1993. 227-259.
. `Plot and Patriarchy in the Age of Reagan: Teading Back to the Future and Brazil.` Another Tale to Tell: Politics and Narrative in Postmodern Culture. London: Verso, 1990. 227-242.
. `These Integrations I`m Looking forward to: Science Fiction from New Wave to New Age.` Another Tale to Tell. 83-94.
Pielke. Robert G. `Star Wars vs. 2001: A Question or Indentity.` Extrapolation, 24.2 (1983): 143-55.
Rieder, John. `Embracing the Alien: Science Fiction in Mass Culture.` Science-Fiction Studies 26 (1982): 26-37.
Rosenbaum, Honathan. `The Solitary Pleasures of Star Wars.` Sight and Sound 46.4 (1977): 208-210.
Ruppersburg, Hugh. `The Alien Messiah.` Kuhn 158-166.
Ruppert, Peter, `Blade Runner: The Utopian Dialectics of Science fiction Films.` Cineaste, 17.2 (1989): 8-13.
Ryan, Michael and Douglas Kellner. Camera Politica: The Polotics and Ideology of Contemporary Hollywood Film. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1988.
Sammons, Todd H.`Return of the Jedi: Epic Graffati.` Science-fiction Studies 14 (1987): 355-371.
Schatz, Thomas. `The Sructural Inflrence: New Directions in Film Genre Study.` Frant 91-101.
Scholes, Robert and Eric S. Rabkin. Science Fiction: History, Science, vision. 『SF의 이해』. 김정수 외역. 서울:평민사, 1993.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 『프랑켄쉬타인』. 이현주 역. 서울: 파피루스, 1993.
Simonetta, Salnestroni. `The Science Fiction Films of Andrei Tarkovsky.` Tr. Robert M.Philmus. Science Fiction Srudies 43 (1987): 294-306.
Slouka, Mark. War of the Worlds: Cyberspace and the High-Tech Assault on Reality. 『사이버스페이스 전쟁』. 김인환 역. 서울: 한국경제신 문사, 1996.
Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures. 『두문화』. 오영환 역. 서울:민음사, 1996.
Sobchack, Vivian. `Child/Alien/Father: Patriarchal Crisis and Generic Exchange.` Close Encounters: Film, Feminism, and Science Fiction. Eds. Constance Penley et al. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P. 1991. 7-34.
. Screening Space: The American Science Fiction Film. Now York: Ungar, 1987.
. `The Virfinity of Astronauts: Sex and the Science fiction Film.` Kuhn 103-115.
Sontag, Susan, `The Imagination of Disaster.` Mast and Cohen 451-465.
Stallabrass, Julian. `Empowering Technology: The Exploratuib if Cyberspace.` 「싸이버스페이스의 탐험」. 고경하 역.『창작과 비 평』91 (1996): 354-404.
Stern, Michael. `Making Culture into Nature.` Kuhn 111-222.
Strick, Philip. `the Age of the Replicant.` sight and sound 51.3 (1982): 168-172.
Taubin, Amy. `Inbading Bodies, `Sight and Sound 2.3 (1992): 8-13.
Tarratt, Margaret, `Monsters from the Id.` Grant 161-181.
Telotte, J. P. `Science Fiction in Double Focus: Forbidden Planet.` Film Criticism 13.3 (1989): 25-36.
.`The Doubles of Fantasy and the Space of Desire.` Kuhn 152-159.
.`Human Artifice and the Science Fiction Film.` film Quarterly 36.3 (1983): 44-51.
Turner. W, Film as Social Practice. 『대중영화의 이해』. 임재철 외역. 서울: 한나래, 1994.
Westfahl, Gray. `Man against Man, Brain against Brain`: The Transformation of Melodrama in Science Fiction.` Melodrama, Ed. Hames Redmond. Cambridge: Canbridge UP, 1992. 193-211.
Wood Robin. Hollywood form Vietnam to Reagan, 『베트남에서 레이건까 지』. 이순진 역. 서울:시각과 언어, 1993.
Wright, Judith Hess. `Genre Films and the Status Quo.“ Grant 41-49.
바이첸바움, 요제프,『컴퓨터 사회, 과연 낙원인가』. 이말 역. 서 울:명경, 1995.
포스터, 마크. 장은수 역.「버추얼 보드리야르, 또는 마샬 맥구한의 달성되지 못한 유산」.『현대사상』창간호 (1997): 121-136.
김용호. 「영화 속 시간의 확장, 영화 밖 삶의 재창조:<터미네이터>와 물리학 의 시간 개념」. 『문화 연구 어떻게 할 것인가』. 서울: 현실문 화연구, 1993. 159-178.
이필렬. 「복제 양(羊) 돌리, 인간복제의 시작인가」. 『창작과 비평』96 (1997): 227-236.
장회익. 「과학기술문명과 온 생명」.『현대사회와 과학문명』. 서울대 사회 정의연구실천모임 편. 서울:나남, 1997.
최종욱.「현대의 위기와 ‘위험사회’의 현상학」.『현대의 위기와 새로운 사회 운동』.서울:문원. 1994.
홍성태 편. 『사이버공간, 사이버문화』. 서울:문화과학사, 1996.
. `They Came from beyond the Center: Ideology and Political Textuality in the Radical Science Fiction Films of James Cameron.` Literature-Film Quarterly 22.1(1994): 21-7
Arendt, Hanna. The Human Condition. 『인간의 조건』. 이진우·태정호 역. 서울: 민음사, 1996.
Baxterm, John. Science Fiction in the Cinema. New York: Barnes, 1970
Beck, Uirich. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. 홍 성태 역. 『위험 사회: 새로운 근대(성)을 위하여』. 서울:새물결, 1997
Bergstrom, Janet. `Androids and Androgyny.` Camera Obscura 15 (1986): 15, 36-65.
Biro, Mattew. `The New Man as Cyborg: Figures of Technology in Weimar Visual Culture.` New German Critique 62 (1994): 71-109.
Biskind, Peter, `Pods, Blobs, and Ideology in American Films of the Fifties.` Shadows of the Magic Lamp: Fantasy and Science Fiction In Film. Ed. George Slusser and Eric S. Rabkin (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois UP, 1985. 58-71.
.Seeing Is Believing: How Hollywood Taught Us to Stop Worrying and Love the Fifties. New York: Pavtheon, 1983.
Bourget, Jean-Loup, `Social Implications in the Hollywood Genres.` Grant 50-8.
Braudy, Leo. The World in a Frame. Chicago & London: The Uni. of Chicago Press, 1976.
Bruno, Giuliana. ` Ramble City: Postmodernism and Blde Runner.` Kuhn 183-195.
Bukatman, Scott Richard. `Terminal Identity: The Virtual Subjectin Postmodern Science Fiction.` Diss. New York University, 1992. Ann Arbor: /uMI, 1993. 9237926.
.`Who Prigrams You? The Science fiction of the Spectacle.` Kuhn 196-213.
Byers, Thomas B. `Commodity Future.` Kuhn 39-50
Carter, Paul A. `I Have Seen the Future and It Irks.` Another Part of the Fifities. New York: Columbia UP. 227-255.
Chevrier, Yves. `Blade Runner; or, The Sociology of Anticipation.` TRrans. Will Straw. Science-Fiction Studies 32 (1984): 50-60.
Cranny-Francis, Anne. `Feminist Futures: A Generic Study.` Kuhn 219-227.
Collins, J. `New Genericity in the 1990s.` Film Theory Goes to the Movies. Ed. Jim Collins, Hilary Randner and Ava Preacher Collins. New York: Routledge, 1993. 242-263.
Collins, Robert G. `Star Wars: The Pastiche of Myth and the Yearning for a Past Future.` Journal of Popular Culture 11.1 (1997): 1-10.
Colwell, C. Carter. `Primitvism in the Movies of Ridley Scott: Alien & Blade Runner.` Kerman 124-131.
Corliss, Richard. `The Invasion Has Begun.` Time & July 1996.
Creed, Barbara, `Alien and the Monstrous-Feminine.` Kuhn 128-141.
. `From Here to Modernity: Feminism and Postmodernism.` Screen 28.2 (1987): 47-67.
.`Gynesis, Postmodernism and the Science Fiction Horror Film.` Kuhn 214-218.
. `Horror and the Monsterous- Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection.` Screen 27.1 (1986): 44-70.
Curtis, James M.`From American Graffiti to Star Wars.` Jounal of Popular Culture 13.4 (1980): 590-601.
Dean, Joan F. `Between 2001 an Star Wars.` Journal of Popular Film and Television 7.1 (1978): 32-41.
Dempsey, Michael. `Invaders & Encampments: The Films of Philip Karfman.` Film Quarterly 32.3 (1978-79): 17-27.
Dervin, Daniel. `Primal Conditions and Conventions: The Genre of Science Fiction.` Kuhn 96-102.
Desser, David. `Race, Space and Class: The Politics of the SF Film from Metropolis to Blade Runner,` Kerman 110-23.
Dickerson, Vanessa D. `The Ghost of a Self: Female Identity in Mary Shelley`s Frankenstein.` Journal of Popular Culture 27.3 (1993): 79-91.
Doll, Susan and Greg Faller. `Blade Runner and Genre: Film Noir and Science Fiction.` Literature-Film Quarterly 14.2 (1986): 89-100.
Fitting, Peter. `Futurecop: Neutralization of Revolt in Blade Runner.` Science-Fiction Studies 43 (1987): 340-354.
Francavilla, Joseph. `The Amdroid as Doppelganger.` Kerman 4-15.
Framdin, H. `Visions of the Future in Science Fiction Film from 1970 to 1982.` Kuhn 19-31.
Friedman, Norman L. `The Terminator: Changes in Critical Evaluations of Cultural Productions.` Journal or Popular Culture 28.1 (1994) 73-80.
Gabilondo, Joseba. Cinematic Hyperspace: New Hollywood Cinema and Science Fiction Film: Image Commodification in Late Capitalism. Diss. U of California, 1991. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1992. 9216488.
Gibson, William. Nwromancer. 『뉴로맨서』. 노혜경 역. 서울:열음사, 1996.
Gitlin, Todd. `Cornucopia and Its Discontents.` The Sixties: Years of Hope, Days of Rage. New York: Bantom, 1987. 227-225.
Glass, Fred. `The `New Bad Future`: Robocop and 1980`s Sci-Fi Films.` Science as Culture 5 (1989): 7-49.
. `Totally Recalling Arnold: Sex and Violence in the New Bad Future.` Film Quarterly 44.1 (1990): 2-13.
Gordon, Andrew. `Science Fiction Film Criticism: The Postmodern Always Rings Twice.` Science Fiction Studies 43(1987): 386ー391。
.`Science Fiction and Fantasy Film Criticism: The Case of Lucas and Spielberg.` Jourval of the Fantastic in the Arts 2.2 (1989): 81-94.
. `You`ll Never Get Out of Bedford Falls: The Inescapable Family in American Science Fiction and Fantasy Films.` Journal of Popular Film and Television 20.2 (1992): 2-8.
Goscilo, Margaret. `Deconstruction The Terminator.` Film Criticism 12.2 (1987-8): 37-52.
Grant, Barry K., ed. Film Genre Reader. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986.
Gwaltney, Marilyn. `Androids as a Davice for Reflection on Persinhood.` Kerman 32-39.
Haraway, Donna. `A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980`s.` Technoculture. Eds. Constance Penley and Andrew Ross. Minnesota: Minnesota UP, 1990. 173-200.
Huyssen, Andreas. `The Vamp and the Machine: Fritz Lang`s Metropolis.` After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodenism. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1986. 65-81.
Jameson, Fredric. `Postmodernism: Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,` 「포스트모더니즘: 후기자본주의 문화논리」. 정정호· 강내희 편역.『포스트모더니즘론』. 서울:터, 1989. 139-202.
. “Postmodernism and Comsumer Society.` The Anti-Aesthetics: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Ed. Hal Foster. Washington: Bay, 1983. 「포스트모더니즘과 소비사회」. 윤호병 외역『반미학』. 서 울: 현대미학사, 1993. 13-29.
. “Nostalgia for the Present.` Postmodernism: Or, the Cultural Ligic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke UP, 1994. 279-296.
. `Progress Versus Utopia: Or Can We Imagine the Future?` Science-Fiction Studies 27 (1982): 147-158.
. SF Novels/SF Films.` Science-Fiction Studies 22 (1980): 319-322.
Johnson, Glen M. `The Body Snatchers as Novel and Film.` Hournal of Popilar Culture 13.1 (1979): 5-16.
Johnson, William, Focus on the Science Fiction film. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
Kavanagh, James H. Feminism, Humanism and Science in Alien.` Kuhn 73-81.
Kawin, Bruce. `Children of the Light.` Grant 236-257.
. `The Mummy`s Pool.` Mast & Cohen 466-481.
Keel, John A, `The Flying Saucer Subculture.` Communication in Popular Culture. Ed. Robert J. Brake. Ohio: Bowling Freen, 1975.
Kerman, Judith B. `Technology and Politics in the Blade Runner Dystopia.` Kerman 16-24.
. ed. Retrofitting Blade Runner: Issues in Ridley Scott`s Blade Runner and Philip K. Dick`s Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Ohid: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1991.
Kuhn, Annette, ed. Alien Zone: Cultural Theory and Contemporary Science Fiction Cinema. London: Verso, 1990.
. `Border Crossting,` Sight and Sound 2.3 (1992): 14.
Kuiper, Koenraad. `Star Wars: An Imperial Myth.` Journal of Popular Culture 21.4 (1988): 77-86.
Landon, Brooks. `Rethinking Science Fiction Film in the Age of Electronic (Re)production: On a Clear Day You Can See the Horizon of Invisibility. Post Script: Essays in Film and the Humanities 10.1 (1990): 60-71.
Lowenthal, David. The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1985.
Mast, Gerald, and Marshall Cohen, eds. Film Theory and Criticism. New York & Oxford: Oxford UP, 1985.
Meyer, David S. `Star Wars, Star Wars, and American Political Culture.` Journal of Popular Culture 26 (1992): 99-115.
Nagl, Manfred. `The Science Fiction in Historical Perspective.` Science-Fiction Studies 31 (1983): 262-277.
Neale, Stephen. Genre. BFI, 1980.
. `Questions of Genre.` Screen 33.1 (1990): 45-66.
Newton, Judith. `Feminism and Anxiety in Alien.` Kuhn 107-17.
Norberg-Hodge, Helena. Ancient Futures: Learning from Ladakh. 『오래된 미래: 라다크로부터 배운다』. 김종철·김태언 역. 대구: 녹색평론사, 1996.
Ohlin, Peter. `Science Fiction Film Critism and the Debris of Postmodernism.` Science-Fiction Srudies 55 (1991): 411-19.
Penley, Censtance. `Time Travel, Primal Scene and the Critical Dystopia.` Kuhn 116-127.
Pfeil, Fred. `Home Fires Burning: Family Noir in Blue Velvet and Terminater 2.` Shades of Noir: a Reader. Ed. Joan Copjec. London: Verso, 1993. 227-259.
. `Plot and Patriarchy in the Age of Reagan: Teading Back to the Future and Brazil.` Another Tale to Tell: Politics and Narrative in Postmodern Culture. London: Verso, 1990. 227-242.
. `These Integrations I`m Looking forward to: Science Fiction from New Wave to New Age.` Another Tale to Tell. 83-94.
Pielke. Robert G. `Star Wars vs. 2001: A Question or Indentity.` Extrapolation, 24.2 (1983): 143-55.
Rieder, John. `Embracing the Alien: Science Fiction in Mass Culture.` Science-Fiction Studies 26 (1982): 26-37.
Rosenbaum, Honathan. `The Solitary Pleasures of Star Wars.` Sight and Sound 46.4 (1977): 208-210.
Ruppersburg, Hugh. `The Alien Messiah.` Kuhn 158-166.
Ruppert, Peter, `Blade Runner: The Utopian Dialectics of Science fiction Films.` Cineaste, 17.2 (1989): 8-13.
Ryan, Michael and Douglas Kellner. Camera Politica: The Polotics and Ideology of Contemporary Hollywood Film. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1988.
Sammons, Todd H.`Return of the Jedi: Epic Graffati.` Science-fiction Studies 14 (1987): 355-371.
Schatz, Thomas. `The Sructural Inflrence: New Directions in Film Genre Study.` Frant 91-101.
Scholes, Robert and Eric S. Rabkin. Science Fiction: History, Science, vision. 『SF의 이해』. 김정수 외역. 서울:평민사, 1993.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 『프랑켄쉬타인』. 이현주 역. 서울: 파피루스, 1993.
Simonetta, Salnestroni. `The Science Fiction Films of Andrei Tarkovsky.` Tr. Robert M.Philmus. Science Fiction Srudies 43 (1987): 294-306.
Slouka, Mark. War of the Worlds: Cyberspace and the High-Tech Assault on Reality. 『사이버스페이스 전쟁』. 김인환 역. 서울: 한국경제신 문사, 1996.
Snow, C. P. The Two Cultures. 『두문화』. 오영환 역. 서울:민음사, 1996.
Sobchack, Vivian. `Child/Alien/Father: Patriarchal Crisis and Generic Exchange.` Close Encounters: Film, Feminism, and Science Fiction. Eds. Constance Penley et al. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P. 1991. 7-34.
. Screening Space: The American Science Fiction Film. Now York: Ungar, 1987.
. `The Virfinity of Astronauts: Sex and the Science fiction Film.` Kuhn 103-115.
Sontag, Susan, `The Imagination of Disaster.` Mast and Cohen 451-465.
Stallabrass, Julian. `Empowering Technology: The Exploratuib if Cyberspace.` 「싸이버스페이스의 탐험」. 고경하 역.『창작과 비 평』91 (1996): 354-404.
Stern, Michael. `Making Culture into Nature.` Kuhn 111-222.
Strick, Philip. `the Age of the Replicant.` sight and sound 51.3 (1982): 168-172.
Taubin, Amy. `Inbading Bodies, `Sight and Sound 2.3 (1992): 8-13.
Tarratt, Margaret, `Monsters from the Id.` Grant 161-181.
Telotte, J. P. `Science Fiction in Double Focus: Forbidden Planet.` Film Criticism 13.3 (1989): 25-36.
.`The Doubles of Fantasy and the Space of Desire.` Kuhn 152-159.
.`Human Artifice and the Science Fiction Film.` film Quarterly 36.3 (1983): 44-51.
Turner. W, Film as Social Practice. 『대중영화의 이해』. 임재철 외역. 서울: 한나래, 1994.
Westfahl, Gray. `Man against Man, Brain against Brain`: The Transformation of Melodrama in Science Fiction.` Melodrama, Ed. Hames Redmond. Cambridge: Canbridge UP, 1992. 193-211.
Wood Robin. Hollywood form Vietnam to Reagan, 『베트남에서 레이건까 지』. 이순진 역. 서울:시각과 언어, 1993.
Wright, Judith Hess. `Genre Films and the Status Quo.“ Grant 41-49.
바이첸바움, 요제프,『컴퓨터 사회, 과연 낙원인가』. 이말 역. 서 울:명경, 1995.
포스터, 마크. 장은수 역.「버추얼 보드리야르, 또는 마샬 맥구한의 달성되지 못한 유산」.『현대사상』창간호 (1997): 121-136.
김용호. 「영화 속 시간의 확장, 영화 밖 삶의 재창조:<터미네이터>와 물리학 의 시간 개념」. 『문화 연구 어떻게 할 것인가』. 서울: 현실문 화연구, 1993. 159-178.
이필렬. 「복제 양(羊) 돌리, 인간복제의 시작인가」. 『창작과 비평』96 (1997): 227-236.
장회익. 「과학기술문명과 온 생명」.『현대사회와 과학문명』. 서울대 사회 정의연구실천모임 편. 서울:나남, 1997.
최종욱.「현대의 위기와 ‘위험사회’의 현상학」.『현대의 위기와 새로운 사회 운동』.서울:문원. 1994.
홍성태 편. 『사이버공간, 사이버문화』. 서울:문화과학사, 1996.
| 📝 Regist Info |
|
I D : hjyt****** Date : 2015-04-11 FileNo : 16163259 |
Cart  | |
| |