|
| |
|
|
정책체제개념을 이용한 미국무역정책 변화의 이해
파일 
정책체제개념을 이용한 미국무역정책 변화의 이해.hwp
[Size :
82 Kbyte
]
정책체제개념을 이용한 미국무역정책 변화의 이해.hwp
[Size :
82 Kbyte
]
분량 24 Page
가격 3,000 원
×
링크 주소가 복사되었습니다.
링크 주소가 복사되었습니다.
원하는 곳에 붙혀넣기 하세요
카트
|
다운받기
|
 네이버 ID로 다운 받기  카카오 ID로 다운 받기  구글 ID로 다운 받기  페이스북 ID로 다운 받기 |
뒤로
|
자료설명
정책체제개념을 이용한 미국무역정책 변화의 이해에 대한 자료입니다.
up정책체제개념을이용한미국무역정책변화의이해
up정책체제개념을이용한미국무역정책변화의이해
목차/차례
[]
I. 문제의 제기
II. 정책변화와 정책체제
3.1 미국의 구무역정책체제
3.2 미국 무역정책의 최근 변화의 실상
3.3 미국의 신무역정책체제
I. 문제의 제기
II. 정책변화와 정책체제
2.1 정책체제의 정의
2.2 정책체제의 지속성
2.3 정책의 변화와 정책체제의 변화
III. 미국 무역정책의 변천3.1 미국의 구무역정책체제
3.2 미국 무역정책의 최근 변화의 실상
3.3 미국의 신무역정책체제
3.4 변화의 성격: 구체제의 지속인가 정책체제 자체의 변화인가?
IV. 미국 무역정책체제의 변화
4.1 구체제의 작동 원리
4.2 구체제의 붕괴
4.3 새로운 무역정책체제의 형성
V. 이론적 함의
5.3 정치적 현실주의와 신자유주의적 제도주의
VI. 맺는 말
< 참 고 문 헌 >
4.1 구체제의 작동 원리
4.2 구체제의 붕괴
4.3 새로운 무역정책체제의 형성
V. 이론적 함의
5.1 정책체제
5.2 행정학 연구대상으로서의 무역정책5.3 정치적 현실주의와 신자유주의적 제도주의
VI. 맺는 말
< 참 고 문 헌 >
본문/내용
위와 같이 정의된 정책체제는 개념적으로 제도(Institution)의 일종이라고 할 수 있다. 정치·행정현상에 있어서 제도가 중요한 역할을 차지한다는 것은 최근 활발히 논의가 확산되고 있는 제도주의의 기본 논지인데(March and Olsen, 1984; DiMaggio and Powell, forthcoming), 여기서 제도란 대체로 조직의 제반 특성과 아울러 정책결정자들의 행위 및 그들간의 관계를 정의하는 규범이나 규칙등을 모두 포함하는 개념으로 이해된다(Ikenberry, 1988). 따라서 정책체제라는 관점에서 정책현상을 분석한다는 것은 기본적으로 제도주의의 입장을 취하는 것이라고 할 수 있다. 논자에 따라 신제도주의라고 부르는 경우도 있으며 그냥 제도주의라고 부르는 경우도 있으나, 여기서는 구별없이 제도주의라고 칭하기로 한다.
Ikenberry(1988)는 제도주의적 접근방법에 입각한 분석에 있어서의 전제들로서 다음과 같은 점들을 제시하였다. 첫째, 제도는 개인 또는 집단들이 갖는 선호, 이해관계 및 세력등을 근본적으로 제약하며 때로는 그것들 자체를 형성하기도 한다. 둘째, 제도는 일단 확립되고 나면 그 형성배경이 되었던 환경조건들이 달라진다 하더라도 쉽게 …
Ikenberry(1988)는 제도주의적 접근방법에 입각한 분석에 있어서의 전제들로서 다음과 같은 점들을 제시하였다. 첫째, 제도는 개인 또는 집단들이 갖는 선호, 이해관계 및 세력등을 근본적으로 제약하며 때로는 그것들 자체를 형성하기도 한다. 둘째, 제도는 일단 확립되고 나면 그 형성배경이 되었던 환경조건들이 달라진다 하더라도 쉽게 …
참고문헌
< 참 고 문 헌 >
강 민. (1991). “공공정책의 구조적 분석,” 강 민 외 공저, ꡔ국가와 공공정책: 한국 국가 이론의 재조명ꡕ, 법문사, 157-179.
김 정수. (1991). “국내정책과 무역정책 간 연계에 관한 고찰: 미국 88통신무역법을 중심으로,” ꡔ한국행정학보ꡕ, 25(3): 1035-1052.
최 병일. (1992). “한·미 통신교역협상: 갈등의 부분적 해소,” 통신정책 Issue, 4(4).
Cline, William R. (1983). “Introduction and Summary,” in William R. Cline (ed.), Trade Policy in the 1980s, Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Cooper, Richard N. (1972). “Economic Interdependence and Foreign Policy in the Seventies,” World Politics, 24: 159-181.
Destler, I. M. (1986a). American Trade Politics: System Under Stress, Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
_____________. (1986b).“Protecting Congress or Protecting Trade?” Foreign Policy, No. 62, 96-107.
DiMaggio, Paul. (1988). “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory,” in Lynne G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 3-21.
DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell. (forthcoming.) “Introduction to the New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis,” in Walter W. Powell and Paul DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downs, Anthony. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Brothers.
Elkin, Stephen L. (1986). “Regulation and Regime: A Comparative Analysis,” Journal of Public Policy, 6(1).
Fürst, Andrea. (1989). “The ‘Interaction Mechanism’ between Congress and the President in Making U.S. Foreign Trade Policy,” in Carl-Ludwig Holtfrerich (ed), Economic and Strategic Issues in U.S. Foreign Policy, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Gilpin, Robert. (1981). War amd Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldstein, Judith. (1986). “The Political Economy of Trade: Institutions of Protection,” American Political Science Review, 80(1): 161-184.
_________________. (1988). “Ideas, Institutions, and American Trade Policy,” International Organization, 42(1): 179-217.
Haggard, Stephan. (1988). “The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act of 1934,” International Organization, 42(1): 91-119.
Ikenberry, G. John. (1988). “Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy,” International Organization, 42(1): 219-243.
Jervis, Robert. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kelman, Steven. (1988). “Why Public Ideas Matter,” in Robert B. Reich (ed.), The Power of Public Ideas, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 31-53.
Kim, Chulsu. (1986). “U.S. Trade Laws and Trade Policy,” Korea-U.S. Trade Relations: Issues and Prospects I, Presentation at the First Ilhae/Brookings Joint Seminar on U.S. Trade Policy, March 25-April 3.
Kim, Jungsoo. (1991). Political Economy of Domestic-Trade Policy Linkage: The Impact of the AT&T Divestiture on U.S. Telecommunications Trade Policy, Ph.D Dissertation, Yale University.
Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Krasner, Stephen D. (1983). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1-21.
Krugman, Paul. (1990). “Protecionism: Try It, You`ll Like It,” The International Economy, June/July.
Lake, David A. (1988). “The State and American Trade Strategy in the Pre-Hegemonic Era,” International Organization, 42(1): 33-58.
Lee, Che-Jin and Hideo Sato. (1982). U.S. Policy Toward Japan and Korea, New York: Praeger Publisher.
Lipson, Charles. (1984). “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs,” World Politics, 37: 1-23.
March, James G. and John P. Olsen. (1984). “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” The American Political Science Review, 78: 734-749.
Maskus, Keith E. (1987). “The View of Trade Problems from Washington`s Capital Hill,” The World Economy, 10(4).
Mastanduno, Michael, David A. Lake and G. John Ikenberry. (1989). “Toward a Realist Theory of State Action,” International Studies Quarterly, 33(4): 457-474.
Mayhew, David R. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Moe, Terry. (1990). “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story,” prepared for the Yale Law School / Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization Conference on the Organization of Political Institutions, April 27-28.
Pfeiffer, Margaret K. (1988). “The Legal Framework of United States-Korea Trade Relations,” presented at the International Conference on the Dynamics of U.S.-Korea Trade Relations, New Haven, November 10-12.
Piper, Don C. and Ronald J. Terchek. (1983). Interaction: Foreign Policy and Public Policy, Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Putnam, Robert D. (1988). “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, 42(3): 427-460.
Rielly, John E. (ed.). (1987). American Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy 1987, The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
Rose, Richard. (1976). “Models of Change,” in Richard Rose (ed.), The Dynamics of Public Policy: A Comparative Analysis, London: Sage Publications.
Rosenau, James N. (1980). “Toward the Study of National-International Linkages,” in his The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, London: Frances Pinters, 370-401.
Roskin, Michael. (1974). “From Pearl Harbor to Vietnam: Shifting Generational Paradigms and Foreign Policy,” Political Science Quarterly, 89(3): 563-588.
Snidal, Duncan. (1985). “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” Internationl Organization, 39(4).
Stern, Paul. (1990). “The U.S. Congress` New Trade Agenda,” The International Economy, June/July.
Stoker, Robert P. (1989). “A Regime Framework for Implementation Analysis: Cooperation and Reconciliation of Federalist Imperatives,” Policy Studies Review, 9(1).
Strange, Susan. (1982). “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis,” International Organization, 36(2): 479-496.
U.S. Congress. (1984). Telecommunications Trade, Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Trade of the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate, S.Hrg. 98-1056, June 26.
______________. (1987). Telecommunications Trade, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance of the Committee on Energy and Commerce on H.R.3, U.S. House of Representatives, 100th Congress, 1st Session, March 10.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics, Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Zucker, Lynne G. (1988). “Where Do Institutional Patterns Come From? Organizations as Actors in Social Systems,” in Lynne G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Pattersn and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 23-49.
“The New Trade Act: Tool for Exporters,” Business America, October 24, 1988.
“Trade Bill: Partial Remedy for Complex Problem,” Congresstional Quarterly, April 30, 1987.
“Status of Major Legislation: 100th Congress,” Congressional Quarterly, October 22, 1988.
강 민. (1991). “공공정책의 구조적 분석,” 강 민 외 공저, ꡔ국가와 공공정책: 한국 국가 이론의 재조명ꡕ, 법문사, 157-179.
김 정수. (1991). “국내정책과 무역정책 간 연계에 관한 고찰: 미국 88통신무역법을 중심으로,” ꡔ한국행정학보ꡕ, 25(3): 1035-1052.
최 병일. (1992). “한·미 통신교역협상: 갈등의 부분적 해소,” 통신정책 Issue, 4(4).
Cline, William R. (1983). “Introduction and Summary,” in William R. Cline (ed.), Trade Policy in the 1980s, Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
Cooper, Richard N. (1972). “Economic Interdependence and Foreign Policy in the Seventies,” World Politics, 24: 159-181.
Destler, I. M. (1986a). American Trade Politics: System Under Stress, Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
_____________. (1986b).“Protecting Congress or Protecting Trade?” Foreign Policy, No. 62, 96-107.
DiMaggio, Paul. (1988). “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory,” in Lynne G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 3-21.
DiMaggio, Paul and Walter W. Powell. (forthcoming.) “Introduction to the New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis,” in Walter W. Powell and Paul DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downs, Anthony. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Brothers.
Elkin, Stephen L. (1986). “Regulation and Regime: A Comparative Analysis,” Journal of Public Policy, 6(1).
Fürst, Andrea. (1989). “The ‘Interaction Mechanism’ between Congress and the President in Making U.S. Foreign Trade Policy,” in Carl-Ludwig Holtfrerich (ed), Economic and Strategic Issues in U.S. Foreign Policy, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Gilpin, Robert. (1981). War amd Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldstein, Judith. (1986). “The Political Economy of Trade: Institutions of Protection,” American Political Science Review, 80(1): 161-184.
_________________. (1988). “Ideas, Institutions, and American Trade Policy,” International Organization, 42(1): 179-217.
Haggard, Stephan. (1988). “The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act of 1934,” International Organization, 42(1): 91-119.
Ikenberry, G. John. (1988). “Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy,” International Organization, 42(1): 219-243.
Jervis, Robert. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kelman, Steven. (1988). “Why Public Ideas Matter,” in Robert B. Reich (ed.), The Power of Public Ideas, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 31-53.
Kim, Chulsu. (1986). “U.S. Trade Laws and Trade Policy,” Korea-U.S. Trade Relations: Issues and Prospects I, Presentation at the First Ilhae/Brookings Joint Seminar on U.S. Trade Policy, March 25-April 3.
Kim, Jungsoo. (1991). Political Economy of Domestic-Trade Policy Linkage: The Impact of the AT&T Divestiture on U.S. Telecommunications Trade Policy, Ph.D Dissertation, Yale University.
Kingdon, John W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Krasner, Stephen D. (1983). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” in Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1-21.
Krugman, Paul. (1990). “Protecionism: Try It, You`ll Like It,” The International Economy, June/July.
Lake, David A. (1988). “The State and American Trade Strategy in the Pre-Hegemonic Era,” International Organization, 42(1): 33-58.
Lee, Che-Jin and Hideo Sato. (1982). U.S. Policy Toward Japan and Korea, New York: Praeger Publisher.
Lipson, Charles. (1984). “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs,” World Politics, 37: 1-23.
March, James G. and John P. Olsen. (1984). “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” The American Political Science Review, 78: 734-749.
Maskus, Keith E. (1987). “The View of Trade Problems from Washington`s Capital Hill,” The World Economy, 10(4).
Mastanduno, Michael, David A. Lake and G. John Ikenberry. (1989). “Toward a Realist Theory of State Action,” International Studies Quarterly, 33(4): 457-474.
Mayhew, David R. (1974). Congress: The Electoral Connection, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Moe, Terry. (1990). “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story,” prepared for the Yale Law School / Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization Conference on the Organization of Political Institutions, April 27-28.
Pfeiffer, Margaret K. (1988). “The Legal Framework of United States-Korea Trade Relations,” presented at the International Conference on the Dynamics of U.S.-Korea Trade Relations, New Haven, November 10-12.
Piper, Don C. and Ronald J. Terchek. (1983). Interaction: Foreign Policy and Public Policy, Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Putnam, Robert D. (1988). “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, 42(3): 427-460.
Rielly, John E. (ed.). (1987). American Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy 1987, The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
Rose, Richard. (1976). “Models of Change,” in Richard Rose (ed.), The Dynamics of Public Policy: A Comparative Analysis, London: Sage Publications.
Rosenau, James N. (1980). “Toward the Study of National-International Linkages,” in his The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy, London: Frances Pinters, 370-401.
Roskin, Michael. (1974). “From Pearl Harbor to Vietnam: Shifting Generational Paradigms and Foreign Policy,” Political Science Quarterly, 89(3): 563-588.
Snidal, Duncan. (1985). “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” Internationl Organization, 39(4).
Stern, Paul. (1990). “The U.S. Congress` New Trade Agenda,” The International Economy, June/July.
Stoker, Robert P. (1989). “A Regime Framework for Implementation Analysis: Cooperation and Reconciliation of Federalist Imperatives,” Policy Studies Review, 9(1).
Strange, Susan. (1982). “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis,” International Organization, 36(2): 479-496.
U.S. Congress. (1984). Telecommunications Trade, Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Trade of the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate, S.Hrg. 98-1056, June 26.
______________. (1987). Telecommunications Trade, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance of the Committee on Energy and Commerce on H.R.3, U.S. House of Representatives, 100th Congress, 1st Session, March 10.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics, Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Zucker, Lynne G. (1988). “Where Do Institutional Patterns Come From? Organizations as Actors in Social Systems,” in Lynne G. Zucker (ed.), Institutional Pattersn and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company, 23-49.
“The New Trade Act: Tool for Exporters,” Business America, October 24, 1988.
“Trade Bill: Partial Remedy for Complex Problem,” Congresstional Quarterly, April 30, 1987.
“Status of Major Legislation: 100th Congress,” Congressional Quarterly, October 22, 1988.
| 📝 Regist Info |
|
I D : kgto****** Date : 2015-08-30 FileNo : 16152017 |
Cart  | |
| |