º»¹®/³»¿ë
Âü°í·Î ¼öÇàÆò°¡¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ¿ë¾î·Î ÓÛäÐîÜ Æò°¡, ÁøÁ¤ÇÑ Æò°¡, »ýÅÂÇÐÀû Æò°¡, Á¤º¸Á¦°ø Æò°¡ µîÀÇ °³³äÀÌ ¼·Î Åë¿ëµÇ±âµµ Çϰí, »óȲ¿¡ µû¶ó ¾à°£¾¿ °Á¶Á¡À» ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¡®¼öÇàÆò°¡(performance assessment)¡¯°¡ ±¹³»¿Í ±¹¿Ü¿¡¼ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ¿ì¼¼ÇÑ À§Ä¡¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇØ °¡°í ÀÖ´Ù. ºñ±³ÇØ º¸¸é ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù.
ù°, ´ë¾ÈÀû Æò°¡(alternative assessment)´Â Ç¥ÁØÈµÈ ¼±´ÙÇü °Ë»ç¸¦ ´ëüÇÏ¿©, ÇнÀ °úÁ¦ÀÇ ¼öÇàÀ» Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÌ°íµµ ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¸»ÇÑ´Ù. ÇöÀç Áö¹èÀûÀÎ Æò°¡ ¹æ½ÄÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ´ëüÇÏ´Â »õ·Î¿î Æò°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ̶õ ¶æÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëµÈ´Ù. ¼öÇàÆò°¡°¡ º¸ÆíÀûÀÎ ÆÐ·¯´ÙÀÓÀ¸·Î µîÀåÇÑ´Ù°í ÇÏ´õ¶óµµ, ¼öÇàÆò°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀÌ »õ·Î¿î ¹®Á¦¸¦ ¾ß±âÇÏ¿´À» °æ¿ì, ¶Ç ´Ù¸¥ ´ë¾ÈÀû Æò°¡°¡ ÃâÇöÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
µÑ°, ÁøÁ¤ÇÑ Æò°¡(authentic assessment)´Â ÀÛÀ§ÀûÀ̰í ÅëÁ¦°¡ ½ÉÇϸç Å»¸Æ¶ôÀû Æò°¡¸¦ ´ë½ÅÇÏ¿©, ½ÇÁ¦ ÇнÀÀ̳ª »î°ú °ü·ÃµÈ °úÁ¦¸¦ ºÎ°úÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â ¹æ½ÄÀ» ¸»ÇÑ´Ù. Æò°¡ °úÁ¦°¡ ½ÇÁ¦ »îÀ̳ª ÇнÀ°ú °ü·ÃµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù´Â Á¡¿¡¼ ÁÖ¸ñÀ» ¹Þ°í ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ±³À°ÀÇ ³»¿ëÀº ½ÇÁ¦¼ºÀ̶ó´Â ±âÁظ¸À¸·Î °áÁ¤ÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ ¹®Á¦°¡ µÈ´Ù. Ç×Á¸ÀûÀÌ¸ç º¸ÆíÀû¡¦(»ý·«)
Âü°í¹®Çå
±èÀçÃᡤ¼Ò°æÈñ(1999). ¡¸¼öÇàÆò°¡ Á¤ÂøÀ» À§ÇÑ ±³À°°úÁ¤ ¿î¿µ ¹æ¾È¡¹. ¡º¼öÇàÆò°¡ Á¤ÂøÀ» À§ÇÑ ¼¼¹Ì³ª ÀÚ·áÁý¡». Çѱ¹±³À°°úÁ¤Æò°¡¿ø.
±èÁ¾¼ µî(1997). ¡º±³À°°úÁ¤°ú ±³À°Æò°¡¡». ±³À°°úÇлç.
¹ÚÀα⠵î(1999).¡º±¹¾î°ú ¼öÇàÆò°¡¡». »ïÁö¿ø.
¹é¼ø±Ù(1999).¡¸¼öÇàÆò°¡ Á¤ÂøÀ» À§ÇÑ ±³À°Æò°¡ ¿î¿µ ¹æ¾È¡¹¡º¼öÇàÆò°¡ Á¤ÂøÀ» À§ÇÑ ¼¼¹Ì³ª ÀÚ·áÁý¡». Çѱ¹±³À°°úÁ¤Æò°¡¿ø.
À±Èñ¿ø(1998). ¡¸¸éÁ¢ÀüÇüÀÇ È°¿ë ¹æ¾È¡¹.¡º´ëÇÐ ÀÔÇÐ ¸éÁ¢ ÀüÇüÀÚ·áÀÇ °³¹ß°ú Ȱ¿ë ¹æ¾È Ž»ö¡»(¼¼¹Ì³ª ÀÚ·áÁý). Çѱ¹±³À°°úÁ¤Æò°¡¿ø.
ÀÌÀç½Â(1999). ¡¸±¹¾î°ú ¼ºÃë±âÁØ¡¤Æò°¡±âÁØ °³¹ß ¹æÇâ ¹× ¿¹½Ã¾È¡¹,¡ºÁ¦7Â÷ ±³À°°úÁ¤¿¡ µû¸¥ ÃʵîÇб³1, 2Çг⠼ºÃë±âÁØ¡¤Æò°¡±âÁØ °³¹ß ¿¬±¸¡». ¿¬±¸ÀÚ·á ORM99-5. Çѱ¹±³À°°úÁ¤Æò°¡¿ø.
Àå°æÀº(1999).¡¸È¹ý ¼öÇà Æò°¡ °èȹ¡¹.¡ºÇÔ²²¿©´Â ±¹¾î ±³À°¡». 1999³â º½È£. Àü±¹±¹¾î±³»ç¸ðÀÓ.
õ°æ·Ï µî(1997).¡º°íµîÇб³ ±¹¾î ±¹°¡°øÅë Àý´ëÆò°¡ ±âÁØ °³¹ß ¿¬±¸¡». ¼öŹ¿¬±¸ CR 97-55-1. Çѱ¹±³À°°³¹ß¿ø.
õ°æ·Ï(1998a).¡¸±¹¾î°ú Æò°¡ÀÇ »õ·Î¿î ¹æÇâ(3)--¸»Çϱ⡤µè±âÀÇ ¼öÇàÆò°¡--¡¹.¡ºÇÔ²²¿©´Â ±¹¾î±³À°¡».1998³â ¿©¸§È£. Àü±¹±¹¾î±³»ç¸ðÀÓ.
õ°æ·Ï(1998b).¡¸±¹¾î°ú ¼öÇàÆò°¡¡¹. ¹é¼ø±Ù(Æí).¡ºÁßÇб³ °¢ ±³°úº° ¼öÇàÆò°¡ÀÇ À̷аú ½ÇÁ¦¡». ¿ø¹Ì»ç.
õ°æ·Ï(1998c).¡¸±¹¾î°ú ¼öÇàÆò°¡ÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦¡¹.¡º±³À°¿ùº¸¡»98³â 12¿ùÈ£. ±³À°ºÎ.
õ°æ·Ï(1999a).¡¸µ¶¼ ±³À°°ú µ¶¼ Æò°¡¡¹. ¡ºµ¶¼ ¿¬±¸¡» Á¦4Áý. Çѱ¹µ¶¼ÇÐȸ.
õ°æ·Ï(1999b). ¡¸±¹¾î ÀÌÇØ ´É·Â Æò°¡ -¼öÇàÆò°¡ÀÇ Àû¿ë ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î¡¹. Çѱ¹±¹¾î±³À°¿¬±¸È¸ Ãá°è Çмú ¹ßÇ¥ ´ëȸ.
õ°æ·Ï(1999c). ¡¸¿Ü±¹ÀÇ ±¹¾î°ú ¼öÇàÆò°¡ »ç·Ê¡¹.¡ºÃÊÁßµîÇб³ ±³°úº° ¼öÇàÆò°¡ÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦(2)¡»ORM99-3-2. Çѱ¹±³À°°úÁ¤Æò°¡¿ø.
õ°æ·Ï(1999d). ¡¸±¹¾î°ú ¼öÇàÆò°¡ÀÇ ÀÌ·ÐÀû Ž»ö¡¹.¡º±¹¾î°ú ¼öÇàÆò°¡¡»´ë±¸°æºÏÃʵ¾î±³À°ÇÐȸ. ¿©¸§ Á¤±â Çмú ¹ßǥȸ.
õ°æ·Ï(1999e). ¡¸±¹¾î°ú ¼öÇàÆò°¡ÀÇ À̷аú ½ÃÇà ¹æ¾È¡¹. ¡º¼öÇàÆò°¡ÀÇ ÀÌ·Ð ¹× ÇöÀå Àû¿ë »ç·Ê¡».¼¼¹Ì³ª ÀÚ·áÁý. Çѱ¹±³¿ø´ëÇб³ ¾î¹® ±³À° ¿¬±¸¼Ò.
Ãֹ̼÷ µî(1998).¡º±¹°¡ ±³À°°úÁ¤¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÑ Æò°¡ ±âÁØ ¹× µµ±¸ °³¹ß ¿¬±¸-°íµîÇб³ ±¹¾î-¡».¿¬±¸º¸°í RRE 98-3-3 Çѱ¹±³À°°úÁ¤Æò°¡¿ø.
Çã°æÃ¶(1999). ¡¸¼öÇàÆò°¡ Á¤ÂøÀ» À§ÇÑ ±³À°°úÁ¤ ¿î¿µ ¹æ¾È¡¹.¡º¼öÇàÆò°¡ Á¤ÂøÀ» À§ÇÑ ¼¼¹Ì³ª ÀÚ·áÁý¡». Çѱ¹±³À°°úÁ¤Æò°¡¿ø.
Au, K. H.(1994) Portfolio Assessment: Experiences at the Kamehameha Elementary Education Program, In Valencia et al. (Eds). Authentic Reading Assessment: Practices and Possibilities. International Reading Association.
Barbara, A. K., Collier, G. V., & Krunglanski, H.(1994). The Maryland School Performance Assessment Program: A new view of assessment. In Valencia et al. (Eds). Authentic Reading Assessment: Practices and Possibilities. International Reading Association.
Barrentine, S. J.(1999). Reading Assessment: Principles and Practices for Elementary Teachers. IRA.
Blum, R. E., Arter, J. A. (Eds). (1996). A Handbook for Student performance assessment in an Era of Restructuring. ASCD.
Calfee, R. (1998). Classroom assessment. M. Graves et al. (Eds). Teaching Reading in the 21st Century. Allyn & Bacon.
Crehan, K. D.(1997). An investigation of the validity of locally development performance measures in a School Assessment Program. ED 410 275.
Frederick, L., & Show, E.l.(1996). A survey of the use of portfolios in serected public elementary schools. ED 406 428.
Haertel, E. H.(1999). Performance assessment and education reform. Phi Delta Kappan 80(9).
Leslie, L., & Jett-Simpson, M. (1997). Authentic Literacy Assessment: An Ecological Approach. Longman.
Madaus G. & O`Dwyer, L. M. (1999). A short history of performance assessment: Lessons learned. Phi Delta Kappan 80(9).
Mclaughlin, M., & Vogt, M. (1996). Portfolios in teacher education. IRA.
McMillan, J. H.(1997). Classroom Assessment: Principle and Practices for Effective Instruction. Allyn & Bacon.
Oregon Department of Education(1996). Oregon`s Writing assessment. In Blum, R. E., & Arter, J. A. (Eds). A Handbook for Student performance assessment in an Era of Restructuring. ASCD.
Oregon Department of Education(1998). Reading and Literature Performance Assessment. Part 2: Grade 5. ODE.
Oregon Department of Education(1999). Oregon statewide writing and mathematic problem-solving assessment. Administration Manual. ODE.
Paris, S. G., Calfee, R. C., Filby, N., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., Valencia, S. W., & Wolf, K.(1992). A framework for authentic assessment. The reading teacher 45. October. International Reading Association.
Perkins, D.(1992). Smart schools: Better thinking and learning for every child. The Free Press.
Terwilliger, J. S.(1997). Portfolios and Classroom Assessment: Some Claims and Questions. ERIC ED 419 000.
Valencia, S. W., Heibert, E. H., & Afflerbach, P. P. (1994). Authentic reading assessment: Practices and Possibilities. IRA.
Valencia, S., & Au, K. H. (1997). Portfolio across educational contexts: Issues of evaluation, teacher development, and system validity. Reading Research Report NO 73. National Reading Research Center. ERIC ED 402 558.
Wagner, C., Brock, D., & Agnew. A. (1994). Developing literacy portfolios in teacher education courses. Journal of Reading 37(8). 668-674.
Wolf, K. P. (1993). From informal to informed assessment: Recognizing the role of the classroom teacher, Journal of reading 36(7), 518-523.
Yen, Ferrara, W. M., & Steven.(1997). The Maryland School Performance Assessment Program: Performance assessment with psychometric quality suitable for high stake usage. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 57(1).