|
| |
|
|
Theoretical and Conceptual basis of the development of Korean Psychology
파일 
Theoretical and Conceptual basis of the developmen….hwp
[Size :
53 Kbyte
]
Theoretical and Conceptual basis of the developmen….hwp
[Size :
53 Kbyte
]
분량 14 Page
가격 1,500 원
×
링크주소가 복사 되었습니다.
원하는 곳에 붙혀넣기 하세요
원하는 곳에 붙혀넣기 하세요
카트
|
다운받기
|
 네이버 ID로 다운 받기  카카오 ID로 다운 받기  구글 ID로 다운 받기  페이스북 ID로 다운 받기 |
뒤로
|
자료설명
여기서 심정(心情)은 mind를 뜻하는 심(心)과 affection을 뜻하는 정(情)의 합성어로서 상대에 대한 ‘felt mind’와 이와 연계...
본문/내용
여기서 심정(心情)은 mind를 뜻하는 심(心)과 affection을 뜻하는 정(情)의 합성어로서 상대에 대한 ‘felt mind’와 이와 연계된 ‘emotion’을 말한다. 보통 felt mind는 자신과 무관한 사람에 대해서 보다는 우리성-정관계나 친밀관계에 있는 사람에 대해서 잘 나타난다. 제 3자 관계에서는 행동을 중심으로 한 immediate한 이해관계가 상호작용과 관계 맺음의 주요한 관심사가 되나 우리성-정관계에서는 immediate한 이해관계보다는 장기적인 관계 맥락과 행위의 이면에 있는 마음이 더욱 중요한 관심사가 되므로 felt mind인 심정경험과 심정 교류가 활성화된다(Choi & Kim, 1997).
우리성-정관계에 있는 당사자들 간의 상호작용에서 심정이 민감하게 활성화되는 context는 상대의 언행이 기존의 우리성관계와 관련하여 중요한 의미나 암시성을 갖는 것으로 느껴지거나 해석될 때이다. 한국인에게는 우리성-정관계의 형성이 매우 중요하기 때문에 제 3자보다는 가까운 사람의 행동과 마음에 더욱 민감하며, 특히 상대의 행동이 자신이 상대에 대해 느끼는 정이나 우리성의 정도에 못 미치는 행동을 했을 때, 이 행동을 자신과 상대와의 관계에 비추어 reflect해 보는 관계-행동 재조명 활동이 활성화된다. 이때 결과적으로 느껴지는 자신의 felt mind가 곧 심정이다. 이렇게 느껴진 마음은 다시 상대의 자신에 대한 우리성-정마음의 정도를 재해석하는 단서가 된다. 우리성-정관…
우리성-정관계에 있는 당사자들 간의 상호작용에서 심정이 민감하게 활성화되는 context는 상대의 언행이 기존의 우리성관계와 관련하여 중요한 의미나 암시성을 갖는 것으로 느껴지거나 해석될 때이다. 한국인에게는 우리성-정관계의 형성이 매우 중요하기 때문에 제 3자보다…
우리성-정관계에 있는 당사자들 간의 상호작용에서 심정이 민감하게 활성화되는 context는 상대의 언행이 기존의 우리성관계와 관련하여 중요한 의미나 암시성을 갖는 것으로 느껴지거나 해석될 때이다. 한국인에게는 우리성-정관계의 형성이 매우 중요하기 때문에 제 3자보다…
참고문헌
Choi, S. C. (1991a). A Psychological Conceptualization of Korean `Han` Concept and It`s Empirical Evaluation (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C. (1991b). Cheong: The Socio-emotional Grammar of Koreans. Paper presented at the Colloquium Series, Dept of Psychology, University of Hawaii, January.
Choi, S. C. (1993a). “Shim-Cheong` Psychology of Korean: Phenomenological Understanding of `Han` and `Cheong` (in Korean). Paper presented at the Symposium of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C. (1993b). A Comparative Analysis of Korean` We-consciousness and Japaneses` Wareware-consciousness (in Korean). Paper presented at the Symposium of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C. (1994). Shim Jung Psychology: The Indigenous Korean Perspective, Asian Psychologies: Indigenous, Social and Cultural Perspectives, Asian Workshop in Korea.
Choi, S. C. (1997). Psychological Characteristics of Koreans (in Korean). in S. C. Choi, et al(Eds.), Understanding of Modern Psychology(pp. 695-766). Seoul: Hak-Moon-Sa.
Choi, S. C., & Choi, S-H. (1990a). `We-ness:` The Korean Discourse of Collectivism. Paper presented at the International Conference, Individualism and Collectivism: Psychocultural Perspectives from East and West. July,9-13, Seoul, Korea.
Choi, S. C., & Choi, S-H. (1990b). The Conceptualization of Korean Tact, Noon-chi. Proceedings of 10th International Congress for International Association for Cross-cultural Psychology. CA: Sage.
Choi, S. C., & Choi, S-H. (1990c). Psychological Structure of `Cheong` (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Choi, Y. H.(1989). The Social Psychological Structure of `Nun-Chi`: A heuristic approach to its conceptualization (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Jean, S. B. (1995). Psychological Representations of Koreans `Nun-Chi` (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Kim, C. W. (1997). `Shim-Cheong` Psychology as a Cultural Psychological Approach to Collective Meaning Construction. Paper presented at the Berlin Conference of International Society for Theoretical Psychology, 27 April - 2 May 1997.
Choi, S. C., & Kim, U. (1992a). Conceptual and Empirical Analysis of Han: An Indigenous Form of Lamentation. Paper presented at the Colloquium at the Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii, April 9.
Choi, S. C., & Kim, U. (1992b). Multifaceted Analyses of Ch’emyon (Social Face):An Indigenous Korean Perspective. Paper presented at the Colloquium at the Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii, May 7.
Choi, S. C., Kim, U., & Choi, S-H. (1993). Indigenous Analysis of Collective Representations: A Korean Perspective In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous Psychology: Research and Experience in Cultural Context(pp. 193-210). Newbury: Sage.
Choi, S. C., Lim, Y-S., & Yu, S-Y. (1991). An Analysis of Korean `Ping-Gye` Concept from Epistemological and Attributional Perspectives (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Yu, S-Y. (1992). Multifaceted Analyses of Ch’emyon(Social Face): An Indigenous Korean Perspective (in Korean). Korean Journal of Social Psychology, 6-2, 1-10.
Choi, S. C., & Yu, S-Y.(1994a). UIRYE-SUNG(Ritualized Social Behavior) As Social Interaction Grammar in Korea (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Yu, S-Y. (1996). An Exploration of a Conceptual Framework of `Shim-Cheong` Psychology (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S-H., & Choi, S. C. (1991). Che-myun: Koreans` Social face. Paper Presented at the Colloquium Series, Dept of Psychology, University of Hawaii, January.
Choi, Y. H & Choi, S. C. (1990). Reasons and Situations arousing Nun-Chi Mechanism (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found its Language. London: Sage.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Hamaguchi, E. (1985). A contextual model of the Japanese: Toward a methodological innovation in Japanese studies. Journal of Japanese Studies.
Kim, Y. K. (1986). Koreans: Who are We? (in Korean). Seoul: Ja-Yoo-Moon-Hwa-Sa.
Lee, Y, R. (1982). Joong-Ang Daily Newspaper, 22, Sep, 1982.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review.
Park, S. H., & Choi, S. C. (1990). A Social-Psychological Conceptualization of the Koreans` Wehood-ness (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Yoon, T. R. (1970). Conscious Structure of Koreans (in Korean). Seoul: Hyen-Am-Sa.
Choi, S. C. (1991b). Cheong: The Socio-emotional Grammar of Koreans. Paper presented at the Colloquium Series, Dept of Psychology, University of Hawaii, January.
Choi, S. C. (1993a). “Shim-Cheong` Psychology of Korean: Phenomenological Understanding of `Han` and `Cheong` (in Korean). Paper presented at the Symposium of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C. (1993b). A Comparative Analysis of Korean` We-consciousness and Japaneses` Wareware-consciousness (in Korean). Paper presented at the Symposium of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C. (1994). Shim Jung Psychology: The Indigenous Korean Perspective, Asian Psychologies: Indigenous, Social and Cultural Perspectives, Asian Workshop in Korea.
Choi, S. C. (1997). Psychological Characteristics of Koreans (in Korean). in S. C. Choi, et al(Eds.), Understanding of Modern Psychology(pp. 695-766). Seoul: Hak-Moon-Sa.
Choi, S. C., & Choi, S-H. (1990a). `We-ness:` The Korean Discourse of Collectivism. Paper presented at the International Conference, Individualism and Collectivism: Psychocultural Perspectives from East and West. July,9-13, Seoul, Korea.
Choi, S. C., & Choi, S-H. (1990b). The Conceptualization of Korean Tact, Noon-chi. Proceedings of 10th International Congress for International Association for Cross-cultural Psychology. CA: Sage.
Choi, S. C., & Choi, S-H. (1990c). Psychological Structure of `Cheong` (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Choi, Y. H.(1989). The Social Psychological Structure of `Nun-Chi`: A heuristic approach to its conceptualization (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Jean, S. B. (1995). Psychological Representations of Koreans `Nun-Chi` (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Kim, C. W. (1997). `Shim-Cheong` Psychology as a Cultural Psychological Approach to Collective Meaning Construction. Paper presented at the Berlin Conference of International Society for Theoretical Psychology, 27 April - 2 May 1997.
Choi, S. C., & Kim, U. (1992a). Conceptual and Empirical Analysis of Han: An Indigenous Form of Lamentation. Paper presented at the Colloquium at the Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii, April 9.
Choi, S. C., & Kim, U. (1992b). Multifaceted Analyses of Ch’emyon (Social Face):An Indigenous Korean Perspective. Paper presented at the Colloquium at the Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii, May 7.
Choi, S. C., Kim, U., & Choi, S-H. (1993). Indigenous Analysis of Collective Representations: A Korean Perspective In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous Psychology: Research and Experience in Cultural Context(pp. 193-210). Newbury: Sage.
Choi, S. C., Lim, Y-S., & Yu, S-Y. (1991). An Analysis of Korean `Ping-Gye` Concept from Epistemological and Attributional Perspectives (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Yu, S-Y. (1992). Multifaceted Analyses of Ch’emyon(Social Face): An Indigenous Korean Perspective (in Korean). Korean Journal of Social Psychology, 6-2, 1-10.
Choi, S. C., & Yu, S-Y.(1994a). UIRYE-SUNG(Ritualized Social Behavior) As Social Interaction Grammar in Korea (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S. C., & Yu, S-Y. (1996). An Exploration of a Conceptual Framework of `Shim-Cheong` Psychology (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Choi, S-H., & Choi, S. C. (1991). Che-myun: Koreans` Social face. Paper Presented at the Colloquium Series, Dept of Psychology, University of Hawaii, January.
Choi, Y. H & Choi, S. C. (1990). Reasons and Situations arousing Nun-Chi Mechanism (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found its Language. London: Sage.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Hamaguchi, E. (1985). A contextual model of the Japanese: Toward a methodological innovation in Japanese studies. Journal of Japanese Studies.
Kim, Y. K. (1986). Koreans: Who are We? (in Korean). Seoul: Ja-Yoo-Moon-Hwa-Sa.
Lee, Y, R. (1982). Joong-Ang Daily Newspaper, 22, Sep, 1982.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review.
Park, S. H., & Choi, S. C. (1990). A Social-Psychological Conceptualization of the Koreans` Wehood-ness (in Korean). Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Korean Psychological Association.
Yoon, T. R. (1970). Conscious Structure of Koreans (in Korean). Seoul: Hyen-Am-Sa.
| 📝 Regist Info |
|
I D : zang******* Date : 2011-08-28 FileNo : 16062699 |
Cart  | |
| |