º»¹®/³»¿ë
_SLIDE_1_
¾ð·ÐÀ±¸® Á¦µµÀÇ ¾Ð·Â
`NBC`¿Í GMÀÇ ÇȾ÷
_SLIDE_2_
Â÷·Ê
¼·Ð - `»ç·Ê4` (P. 70,¡® NBC¿Í GMÀÇ ÇȾ÷¡¯)ºÐ¼®
1
º»·Ð (1) - `»ç·Ê4`¿Í ¿¬°üµÈ ±¹³»»ç·Ê MBCÀÇ ¿Ã¸²ÇÈ Áß°è
2
º»·Ð(2) - `»ç·Ê4`¿Í ¿¬°üµÈ Áß±¹»ç·Ê Áß±¹ÀÇ ¡®°ñÆÇÁö ¸¸µÎ¡¯
3
°á·Ð - Á¦µµÀÇ ¾Ð·Â°ú ¾ð·ÐÀÇ À±¸®
4
Q & A
5
_SLIDE_3_
¾î¶² ÀÌÀ¯¿¡¼µçÁö,
¾ð·ÐÀÇ ´º½º ¿¬ÃâÀº ºñÀ±¸®ÀûÀΰ¡
ÀïÁ¡ :
_SLIDE_4_
»ç·Ê 4. `NBC`¿Í GMÀÇ ÇȾ÷ P.70
_SLIDE_5_
NBC and GM¡¯s Pickup(»ç·Ê 4ÀÇ ¿øº»)
On 17 November 1992, Dateline NBC ran a fifteen-minute segment, ¡°Waiting to Explode.¡± Its focus was the safety of General Motors¡¯ full-size pickup trucks in model years 1973-1987. These trucks were designed with gas tanks mounted outside the frame.
The Dateline report began with the story of Shannon Moseley, a teenager killed in a pickup given to him by his parents. ¡¦(»ý·«)
to light through the careful investigative work ofnot the mediabut the corporation whose reputation Dateline had impugned.
In a November 19 memo, GM blasted the program as ¡°grossly unfair, misleading and irresponsible vicious and unjust,¡± and charged that it was filled with ¡°inaccurate statements, distortions, and facts wrenched out of context.¡± It asked NBC why viewers were not told that the original crash giving rise to the lawsuit ¡°was caused by a speeding, drunken driver who was convicted and spent time in jail for his crime.¡± It complained that the audience was not informed that GM pickups during this period ¡°actually had the lowest incidence of fatal injury in side collision.¡±
Dateline producer Robert Read responded on November 20, claiming a fair and balanced report. ¡°As to our crash demonstration,¡± Read wrote, ¡°we did show the public that at about 40 mph there was no leakage, and we feel our use of these demonstrations was accurate and responsible.¡± Now the battle heated