º»¹®/³»¿ë
2. {´ÏÄÚ¸¶ÄÚ½º À±¸®ÇÐ}¿¡¼ÀÇ Áß¿ë
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:½ÃÀÛ]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:³¡]
1. º¸Æí°ú°³º°
¾Æ¸®½ºÅäÅÚ·¹½º°¡ À±¸®Çп¡ À־ ±×ÀÇ ½º½ÂÀÎ ÇöóÅæÀÇ »ç»óÀ» ´ä½ÀÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù´Â °ÍÀº ÀÌ¹Ì ÁÖÁöÀÇ »ç½ÇÀÌ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¾Æ¸®½ºÅäÅÚ·¹½ºÀÇ ±âº» °¡Á¤Àº ½ÇÀçÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î¼ÀÇ ½Çü´Â ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÌ°í °³º°ÀûÀÎ °Íµé·Î µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ãø¸é¿¡¼ ¿µ¿øÇÑ À̵¥¾Æ´Â Âü½ÇÀçÀÌ¸ç ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ »îÀº ¿µ¿øÇÑ À̵¥¾ÆÀÇ ¸ð»óÀ̶ó´Â ÇöóÅæÀÇ À̷п¡ ¹Ý±â¸¦ µç´Ù. Áï ÇöóÅæÀÌ °³³äµéÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» ÀÌ·ç´Â º¸ÆíÀÚ, Áï À̵¥¾Æµé¸¸ÀÌ º»·¡ÀûÀÌ°í ½ÇÀçÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸°í À̵¥¾ÆµéÀÌ °³º°»ç¹°µé°ú´Â µ¶¸³ÀûÀ¸·Î, µ¶ÀÚÀûÀ¸·Î Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù°í º¸¾ÒÀ¸³ª ÀÌ ÀÌ·ÐÀº ¾Æ¸®½ºÅäÅÚ·¹½º¿¡ ÀÇÇØ °ÅºÎµÈ´Ù. ¾Æ¸®½ºÅäÅÚ·¹½º´Â {ÇüÀÌ»óÇÐ}¿¡¼ ½Çü(Ousia, Substance)¿¡ ´ëÇØ º»Áú(essence), º¸ÆíÀÚ(universal), ·ù(genus)¿Í Åä´ë(substratum)ÀÇ ³× °¡Áö ´ë»óÀ» µé¾î ¼³¸íÇÑ´Ù. ¿©±â¼ º¸ÆíÀÚ(the universal)¿Í Ư¼öÀÚ(the particular)¿¡ ´ëÇØ E. Á©·¯´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°ÀÌ ¼³¸íÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. º¸Æí °³³äµéÀº ½ÇüÀÇ ±¸Ã¼Àû(Ư¼öÇÑ) ¼ºÁúµé¸¸À» ³ªÅ¸³»°í ÀÖ°í, À¯°³³äÀº ´ÜÁö¡¦(»ý·«)
Âü°í¹®Çå
±èűæ, {À±¸®ÇÐ}, ¹Ú¿µ»ç, 1984.
{ÖååÞ}
{ÓÞùÊ}
·¥ºê·¹È÷Æ® P., ±èÅÂ±æ ¿Ü ¿ª, {¼¾çöÇлç}, À»À¯¹®È»ç, 1982.
¹ÎȲ±â, [{ñéé¼}¿¡¼ ñéÀÇ ÇüÀÌ»óÇÐÀû °íÂû], Ãæ³²´ë ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®, 1986.
¹Ú¿ì¼®, [ÇöóÅæ `Ƽ¸¶ÀÌ¿À½º`Æí¿¡ °üÇÑ ´Ü»ó], {Èñ¶øÃ¶ÇÐÀÇ ¹®Á¦µé}, Çö¾Ï»ç, 1993.
¹ÚÀü±Ô, {¾Æ¸®½ºÅäÅÚ·¹½ºÀÇ ½ÇõÀû ÁöÇý}, ¼±¤»ç, 1985.
{ÞÌßöó¢ñÉ}
á³å¯÷Êïñìé, [ÓìÖå], îåõÀ õ÷ÑÑÍÛ ö½ ¿Ü, Á¶¼ºÀ» ¿ª, {Áß±¹»ç»ó°³·Ð}, À̷аú ½Çõ»ç, 1990.
½ºÁîŰ ´ÙÀ̼¼½º, ÔÔÜ迪, {¼±ÀÇ Áø¼ö}, °í·Á¿ø, 1993.
À±Ãµ±Ù, [ñé鼿Úϼ - ñéé¼ÀÇ áãàõáóÔ³Öå], °í·Á´ë ¹Ú»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®, 1987.
{ñéé¼}
ï±ÙÏ, [ñéé¼ãæëù], {Áß±¹Çмú»ç»ó»ç³íÃÑ 2}
Aristotle, Metaphysics, in the works of Aristotle, trans. by W.D. Ross, the Great Books, Univ. of Chicago, 1971.
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, in The Works Of Aristotle, trans. by W.D.Ross, the Great Books, Univ. of Chicago, 1971.
Zeller, E. Outline of the history Greek Philosophy, trans. by L.R.Palrmer, Dover Publication, Inc, New York 1931.
Guthrie, W.K.C., The Greek Philosophers: From Tales to Aristotle, Harper £¦ Row, New York 1960.
Macintyre, A., After Virtue, Univ. of Notre Dame, 1981.
[Abstract]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:½ÃÀÛ]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:³¡]
The modern meaning of Knowledge and Time
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:½ÃÀÛ]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:³¡]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:½ÃÀÛ]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:³¡]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:½ÃÀÛ]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:³¡]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:½ÃÀÛ]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:³¡]
in The Mean
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:½ÃÀÛ]
[¼ûÀº¼³¸í:³¡]
¡ª at Nicomachean Ethics and The Doctrine of The Mean(ñéé¼)
The point of this thesis is to make clear how Knowledge and Time in the Mean make the contemporary meaning. To study this theme to have comparative analysis on concept of the Mean in Nicomachean ethics and The Doctrine of The Mean.
The Summaries of this thesis:
First, Aristotle`s viewpoint of Substance(Ousia) is individual thing in Metaphysics.
And in The Doctrine Of The Mean(ñéé¼) the relationship between Heaven and Man is harmonious. So it makes reducing the argument about The Universal and The Individual.
Second, In the theory of Virtue(Arete, Óì), for aristotle, it is also remarkable point to find out the relation between the practical wisdom (phronesis) and the Mean. And in The Book Of Mean, Time(ãÁ) is related to the middle path(the mean).
Through this analysis to find out the modern meaning of The Mean. In spite of the context about the ancient times, Polis(Athens) and Gyu(ñ²), virtue is related to individual person`s choice. And the choice is faced with a certain accidental situation that to have choose a certain action.
So despite of A. Macintyre`s viewpoint that Virtue existence under the social ground, so individualism and liberalism are harmful for com- munity`s traditional character. Then he declare that we have to choose not Nietsche but Aristotle.
But the relationship of Knowledge and Time at Virtue is able to open the individual`s character. that is because Virtue is rather process that makes man virtuous than to get virtues.